Home » Celebrity Garbage » Angelina Jolie tops Oprah on both sexy list and Forbes’ Celebrity 100
Tags: , ,

rl_angiepowerHot stuff Angelina Jolie has dethroned left-wing talk-show host Oprah Winfrey by becoming the world’s most powerful celebrity by simply having her picture taken a lot and cashing in her kids.

Though Oprah is still the biggest money-maker with $275 million, the 34-year-old Jolie captured the No.1 spot due to a combination of earning power and exposure. In the annual list presented by Forbes magazine, Jolie, whose human rights work along with a poop load of photos of her and hubby Brad Pitt, made $27 million in the past year including $14 million for a magazine deal which gave exclusive rights of the couple’s twins, Know Leaon and Vivienne Marcheline.

Joli recently completed work on her latest project, the spy film Salt.

It’s due out July 23rd.

12/5/09 Editor’s Note: The crossed out numbers were not counted for 2009′s Forbes Celebrity 100 list. They counted towards her No.3 placement in 2008. Here’s a snippet from Forbes:

Jolie raked in $27 million in the past 12 months thanks to a movie schedule that included Kung Fu Panda, Wanted and the not-yet-released spy thriller Salt. Even more impressive: The publicity she garnered following the birth of her twins, as well as the consistent headlines she grabs for her philanthropic efforts and her relationship with actor Brad Pitt, who ranks No. 9 on the list.

13 Responses to “Angelina Jolie tops Oprah on both sexy list and Forbes’ Celebrity 100”

  1. Why do you publish items about Angie since you can't keep from snark?

    Reply
  2. Uh, the photo deal was in 2008 and AJ has only filmed one movie since, in 2009.

    Reply
    • You're correct. Those numbers counted for her No.3 spot in 2008. Our mistake.

      Salt has yet to be released…what are you talking about?

      Reply
  3. How is AJ cashing on her kids?and how is Oprah a left wing talk host?please explain that to me because I am not as enlightened as you are.Please i am waiting on on some deep thoughts and good laugh.

    Reply
    • We provide neither deep thoughts nor good laughs. Just cheap ones.

      \”Cashing in\” due to the bidding war between People and OK! magazine for the rights to publish the first photos of Jolie and Pitt's twins. The bidding ranged around the $14-$15 million mark and proceeds went to charity. Yeah…in retrospect, the only ones really cashing in were the good people at People.

      Oprah was called a \”left-wing\” talk show host because during the run up to the U.S. presidential election last November, Oprah as an early and avid supporter of Barack Obama. Also, in mainstream news, conservative pundits are traditionally called \”ring-wing talk show hosts\” when progressive parties are usually called just \”talk show hosts.\”

      Reply
  4. Oprah is not a political pundit ,darling and definately not left wing,maybe liberal capitalist ,and so what if she supported Obama ,so did many independant and some republican voters.And if AJ did not sell the pics all those magazines would have made millions without penny for charity,so I realy don't get your comments.I am pretty sure that if her kids were all white and not adopted from different countries the world will be much kinder to AJ,but we live in pretty racist country so thats OK.Like one popular conservative pundit said"slavery had its merits"and yes I wouldn't call that a talk show host.

    Reply
    • If I'm \”darling,\” can I call you \”sugar bumps?\”

      Look over what I wrote in my comments. I didn't say Oprah was a political pundit though getting into politics as she did by admittedly supporting and stumping for Omaba, she does enter that arena. There's nothing wrong with that. I never said there was.

      \”Left wing\” is a big tent and you're right, many independents and moderate conservatives supported Obama. You said \”so what\” if she supported Obama and I agree. What's your point in mentioning that?

      People magazine wouldn't have landed a pictorial spread of her twins without Jolie and Pitt. They would have just had candid photographs. I had a retrospect in my other comment about this. You should read it.

      It's interesting that you brought the ethnicity of her kids into this and proceed to make a comment regarding race relations in the United States without it ever being brought up. Why? You even go so far as to quoting the infamous \”merits\” line that was attributed to Rush Limbaugh, which we now know was something he never said. Again, why?

      Angelina Jolie is treated just fine. How is she not?

      I appreciate the debate.

      Reply
  5. You need to read again the first paragraph in your "column" an then maybe you will understand why I bothered to write something.O is not a left wing talk host and AJ is powerful for many other reasons than the one mentioned above,and if u dont't know why i brought the race too bad .think about it.yes think please?

    Reply
    • Yes, I called Oprah a \”left-wing\” talk show host. If your definition of \”left wing\” doesn't meet mine, that's cool. For me, anybody who is on the American left side of politics, including \”liberal capitalist,\” is on the left and is part of the \”left wing.\” What's the problem, Rada? Why are you so offended by my calling her this? Is there something wrong with her being a \”left winger?\” I always thought of her a moderate progressive, which, to me, is part of the \”left wing.\”

      Same goes for the conservative side. There are different degrees.

      Forbes' criteria stated that money, along with presence in the media including photographs and articles, is what made her No.1 on the list. Personally, I don't find her powerful one bit and Oprah is much more influential. I'd love to know your ideas since you seem so keen on bashing mine. Why is Angelina Jolie so powerful to you? Name some of those reasons?

      You seem to be really pissed off here. Much more than you should be for a discussion over trivial things such as Oprah and Angelina Jolie, wouldn't you agree?

      Yes…I suppose it is too bad I don't know why you brought race into it. Seeing as how race was never discussed until you brought it up, I thought you might want to enlighten me as to why you did it. Oprah is black. Is that why? Angelina Jolie's adopted kids are black? Is that why too? And you think Angelina Jolie is given a hard time in the press because she has black kids? Really? Are you talking about the American mainstream media? I have a hard time seeing her as being a target by the press other than the gossip pages.

      Reply
  6. She has black kids?plural?well thats explains everything.Last time I checked khmer people are asian.

    Reply
    • Ah. You got me. Thanks for pointing that out. Still, how does that \”explain everything?\” Explain what?

      Feel free to answer any of my questions or expand on your comments further regarding Jolie's power status, left wing talk show hosts or American race relations.

      Reply